Pages

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

The Nookpad

In my last post I mentioned how I wrote much of the first draft of two books using the Swype keyboard on my phone. Now I've taken this one step further and bought a Nook eReader.

The Nook is just configured for reading, but with a little judicious hacking it can run as a fully capable tablet on which I can now check my emails, write, tweet and even send texts. Now, it's no longer a Nook but a Nookpad.

Just as the E Ink screens are perfect for reading in all lights and all conditions, it's also perfect for writing. It's lightweight, the battery lasts for months and you can sit in direct sunlight and write. It's better than paper, as you don't have to decipher your handwriting afterwards and, at the first available WiFi connection, it backs up everything you've written to make it immediately available on any other device. It's the equivalent of having a dozen notebooks in my back pocket with the pages searchable.

Saturday, May 5, 2012

The Evolution of Writing Tools. Quill - Nib - Ballpoint - Typewriter - Keyboard - Smartphone

In my last post here I talked about how current technology affects the way we can produce, edit and distribute stories. To think a little more on that, I'd like to talk about how the technology we have at our fingertips (literally) shapes how we write. Or, at least, shapes how I write.

Anyone who's ever tried writing will have reached that point where you feel the need to correct what you've done to date rather than continuing writing. This can be the death of the project; if you spend your time trying to get the first x% perfect then you may never get on with finishing it. But I've found the new writing tools available are a perfect means to prevent this.

For years I used to write the first draft of anything by hand, meaning I have a chest full of notebooks and am on around my fifth version of a particular model of Parker pen which they no longer manufacture (the other four having been lost at various times and places). It worked for me because not only is writing by hand a slower process than typing buy you can't easily go back and edit what you've written. This made me think about each line I wrote to make sure I was fairly happy and wouldn't have to rewrite it until I came to typing the whole thing up. The drawback was that my handwriting is atrocious at the best of times, but if I was writing whilst traveling by bus, car, train or plane then it often became illegible.

And then I bought my first touchscreen phone.This was a revelation.

I discovered the Swype keyboard on my phone, where you swipe your finger across the keyboard to spell out words rather than tapping at individual keys; the keyboard looks at the letters your finger passed over and works out what word you're spelling. Once I'd got used to trusting the keyboard to know what word I was trying to spell (which it's surprisingly good at) this was a turning point.

Suddenly I had everything I was in the middle of writing, multiple chapters and stories I was working on, all instantly accessible in my pocket without needing to load up my bag with notebooks. I could write whilst walking. As I could hold and operate the phone with one hand, it meant I could write while I was stood on a train and hold on with the other hand. Anything I wrote my phone was instantly saved to the cloud, so all my writing was immediately backed up and instantly accessible on any device.

The only drawback I found to this method of writing turned out to be a strength. It's not easy to edit things on a touchscreen phone. Jumping through the text, changing words, cutting and pasting are all cumbersome tasks. However, this meant I didn't procrastinate and instead kept on writing. This limitation pushed me forward to finish the first draft, leaving anything that needed to be fixed in subsequent drafts.

I wrote probably half of the first draft of Personal Jesus on my phone and almost the whole of the first draft of The God of Las Vegas. The quality of what I wrote is no different to if I'd written it long hand, it was just a different and more convenient method of getting the words out of my head and into a usable format.

The Great Detective and I

My piece on Sherlock Holmes and what the Great Detective means to me is up today on Bookshelf Bombshells as a part of their celebration of season 2 of Sherlock airing on PBS this weekend. They have a lot of good articles there, so check it out:

http://bookshelfbombshells.com/sherlock-flawed-hero-by-stuart-inskip/

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

The Freedom of Independence

If you've read this blog before you'll know that I'm given to talking about independent publishing. Because that's what I'm doing; I'm writing a series of books and publishing them independently of a publishing house. I don't want you to think I'm doing this because it's fashionable or because publishing houses are obsolete. None of these are true, certainly not the latter. I'm independently publishing because it give me a freedom to experiment and develop a narrative in a way I wouldn't traditionally have; a more organic method of writing. Let me use for example, as a starting point, Charles Dickens.

Most writers, when writing a book, will finish a first draft and then make multiple revisions of this until they're happy it's the best possible version of the story they can create without outside professional consultation, and that's when their agent and/or editor is brought in. They work through the whole story until they're as happy with it as they can be, then their publisher is officially involved and a final version is crafted to be put in front of the public.

For many of his most famous works, Charles Dickens had nowhere near that luxury.

Dickens, like many of his contemporaries, first published his work episodically in magazines. This means that, while he may have already determined the structure and content of works like Great Expectations and Oliver Twist, the actual process of having his audience reading the books was carried out whilst he was still putting pen to paper for the later chapters. As people eagerly picked up the first installment the final one may have not yet even been written. No doubt that, when the pieces were collected to be published in a single volume, there were minor editorial changes but the book as a whole remained the same.

Until now the closest parallel we have to this in modern publishing is comic books, where a similar thing happens in a different medium. However, the emergence of independent publishing allows writers to do something similar, though not directly comparable.

In other posts here I've talked about how writing a single book, Stripped, grew into a larger series called the California Gothic. Once I'd sketched out this series I realized Stripped was no longer a proper fit in the narrative; some of the terminology as well as the tone had changed. If Stripped had been published traditionally then I would most likely have had to either keep the tone of the series consistent with the first book or scrap the idea altogether. Publishing independently, however, gave me a third option. To rework Stripped so that it fitted the series and then republish it as the newly titled Personal Jesus.

The freedom to edit and modify work after publication gives independent authors a great deal of creative freedom; since a majority of the readership consume our work digitally then these changes can be pushed to them. Of course, these changes must be limited so you don't irritate the hell out of your audience; they don't want the book squirming beneath them as they read or find the ending they now have to be completely at odds with the beginning they started with.

You have to find the balance between putting your work before the public while it's still in draft form and improving on it once it's released. Walt Whitman did this throughout the many published versions of Leaves of Grass. He refined the poems it contained, changed their order, dropped some and including others. For Whitman the published work was a living organism that could grow and change in accordance with the author, the audience and the world which it both existed in and commented on.

It is this Whitman-esque spirit that I feel independent publishing can move us back towards. Painters often produce multiple versions of the same work as they develop the underlying ideas and techniques through which they're expressed, and digital publishing offers writers the same flexibility.

And surely it can only be a matter of time before the flexibility of the medium is incorporated into the narrative. Perhaps a work in short story format (to more easily allow for re-reading) that is periodically republished by the author to include new passages or variations on existing ones that offer new meaning to the prose. A truly organic book where the narrative and messages grow as its characters respond to the changes they experience.

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Measuring the Authorial Momentum

It feels so great, now that I have Personal Jesus with my editor. For the first time in months I'm able to devote some head space to book 3 in the California Gothic, The Goddess of Los Angeles. The first part of this was, of course, going back through and reading the 30,000 or so words I'd written before having to go back and re-edit. I also had to go through all of my notes to remind myself what the hell I was writing and where I was going with it. I've also revisited my list of David Bowie song titles (each of the chapters in Los Angeles takes its name from a Bowie song).

Even though I know how important the edits to Personal Jesus are, I couldn't shake the feeling I wasn't making progress through working on book 1 when I'd already finished book 2. However, even just writing two and a half thousand words over the past few days makes me feel I've made huge strides forward. I knew, of course, that editing book 1 was progressing as a whole, but because I wasn't writing for the latest book in the series I felt that my authorial momentum had stalled.

The whole time I've been editing Personal Jesus I've had scenes and dialogue for Los Angeles drifting in and out of my mind, and I can at last begin to order my thoughts.

I just hope I get to finish my first draft without my editor coming back and telling me there are more major changes to make to Personal Jesus.

*Goes back to writing with fingers crossed*